Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025
Impact of sarcopenia on gait independence in older orthopaedic patients: a comparison of 2 diagnostic algorithms.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ikemoto Taiki, Tokuda Mitsunori, Morikawa Yuki, Kuroda Kotoha, Nakayama Naoki, Terada Naho, Niina Misuzu, Matsumoto Daisuke
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the impact of sarcopenia on gait recovery using the Sarcopenia Special Interest Group of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISarcoPRM) and the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS2019) algorithms in older orthopaedic patients.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
PATIENTS: A total of 153 orthopaedic patients (78.4% women; average age 79.3 ± 6.7 years) were included during hospitalization.
METHODS: Sarcopenia was defined using the ISarcoPRM and AWGS2019 algorithms on admission. Functional ambulation categories assessed gait independence before admission and on discharge. The impact of sarcopenia on worsened gait independence on discharge was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Sarcopenia based on the ISarcoPRM algorithm (prevalence=56.2%) was significantly associated with worsened gait independence (odds ratio: 3.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-10.25, p = 0.005), unlike sarcopenia based on AWGS2019 (prevalence=36.6%).
CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia assessed using the ISarcoPRM algorithm was associated with worsened gait independence on discharge in older orthopaedic patients.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
PATIENTS: A total of 153 orthopaedic patients (78.4% women; average age 79.3 ± 6.7 years) were included during hospitalization.
METHODS: Sarcopenia was defined using the ISarcoPRM and AWGS2019 algorithms on admission. Functional ambulation categories assessed gait independence before admission and on discharge. The impact of sarcopenia on worsened gait independence on discharge was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Sarcopenia based on the ISarcoPRM algorithm (prevalence=56.2%) was significantly associated with worsened gait independence (odds ratio: 3.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-10.25, p = 0.005), unlike sarcopenia based on AWGS2019 (prevalence=36.6%).
CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia assessed using the ISarcoPRM algorithm was associated with worsened gait independence on discharge in older orthopaedic patients.