The Knee · 2018
Paediatric physeal sparing posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with parental donation allograft: Rationale and operative approach.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khakha R S, Yasen S K, Wilson A J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Paediatric PCL injuries are rare but constitute a significant management challenge. We describe a novel approach to the surgical management of an 11-year-old boy who presented with persisting symptomatic instability following 18months of failed conservative therapy.
METHODS: PCL reconstruction was performed using a physeal sparing, all-inside technique under fluoroscopic control. This avoids the potential for iatrogenic growth injury. A parentally donated hamstrings allograft was used to ensure adequate graft size, and reinforced using a non-elastic two millimetre braided suture. Graft reinforcement safeguards against stretching during the early healing phase, but must be removed thereafter to avoid creating a physeal tether.
RESULTS: At three months, clinical examination under anaesthesia showed equivalent PCL laxity in the operated knee compared to the normal contralateral knee. The graft reinforcement tape was incised as planned with no change in laxity assessment. Arthroscopic evaluation demonstrated a quiet joint with a well healed graft and no synovitis. Postoperative long leg radiographs showed no growth deformity against preoperative status.
CONCLUSION: In paediatric patients with persisting symptomatic instability despite appropriate conservative management, surgical reconstruction of the PCL should be considered. Standard treatment has higher complication rates and poorer graft survival than in an adult cohort. Specific problems include iatrogenic growth plate injury causing growth arrest or angular deformity, inadequate graft size if using hamstrings autograft, and the additional technical challenge of small patient size. Early results from extra-physeal, all-inside PCL reconstruction using a parentally donated allograft are promising and may provide an alternative solution to traditional surgical management.
METHODS: PCL reconstruction was performed using a physeal sparing, all-inside technique under fluoroscopic control. This avoids the potential for iatrogenic growth injury. A parentally donated hamstrings allograft was used to ensure adequate graft size, and reinforced using a non-elastic two millimetre braided suture. Graft reinforcement safeguards against stretching during the early healing phase, but must be removed thereafter to avoid creating a physeal tether.
RESULTS: At three months, clinical examination under anaesthesia showed equivalent PCL laxity in the operated knee compared to the normal contralateral knee. The graft reinforcement tape was incised as planned with no change in laxity assessment. Arthroscopic evaluation demonstrated a quiet joint with a well healed graft and no synovitis. Postoperative long leg radiographs showed no growth deformity against preoperative status.
CONCLUSION: In paediatric patients with persisting symptomatic instability despite appropriate conservative management, surgical reconstruction of the PCL should be considered. Standard treatment has higher complication rates and poorer graft survival than in an adult cohort. Specific problems include iatrogenic growth plate injury causing growth arrest or angular deformity, inadequate graft size if using hamstrings autograft, and the additional technical challenge of small patient size. Early results from extra-physeal, all-inside PCL reconstruction using a parentally donated allograft are promising and may provide an alternative solution to traditional surgical management.