Spine deformity · 2022
Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system is reliable for classifying complications following surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roye Benjamin D, Fano Adam N, Quan Theodore, Matsumoto Hiroko, Garg Sumeet, Heffernan Michael J, Poon Selina C, Glotzbecker Michael P, Fletcher Nicholas D, Sturm Peter F, Ramirez Norman, Vitale Michael G, Anari Jason B, Pediatric Spine Study Group
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Appropriately measuring and classifying surgical complications is a critical component of research in vulnerable populations, including children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of a modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system (CDS) classification system for EOS patients among a group of pediatric spinal deformity surgeons.
METHODS: Thirty case scenarios were developed and presented to experienced surgeons in an international spine study group. For each case, surgeons were asked to select a level of severity based on the modified CDS system to assess inter-rater reliability. The survey was administered on two occasions to allow for assessment of intra-rater reliability. Weighted Kappa values were calculated, with 0.61 to 0.80 considered substantial agreement and 0.81 to 1.00 considered nearly perfect agreement.
RESULTS: 11/12 (91.7%) surgeons completed the first-round survey and 8/12 (66.7%) completed the second. Inter-observer weighted kappa values for the first and second survey were 0.75 [95% CI 0.56-0.94], indicating substantial agreement, and 0.84 [95% CI 0.70-0.98], indicating nearly perfect agreement, respectively. Intra-observer reliability was 0.86 (range 0.74-0.95) between the first and second surveys, indicating nearly perfect agreement .
CONCLUSION: The modified CDS classification system demonstrated substantial to nearly perfect agreement between and within observers for the evaluation of complications following the surgical treatment of EOS patients. Adoption of this reliable classification system as a standard for reporting complications in EOS patients can be a valuable tool for future research endeavors, as we seek to ultimately improve surgical practices and patient outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
METHODS: Thirty case scenarios were developed and presented to experienced surgeons in an international spine study group. For each case, surgeons were asked to select a level of severity based on the modified CDS system to assess inter-rater reliability. The survey was administered on two occasions to allow for assessment of intra-rater reliability. Weighted Kappa values were calculated, with 0.61 to 0.80 considered substantial agreement and 0.81 to 1.00 considered nearly perfect agreement.
RESULTS: 11/12 (91.7%) surgeons completed the first-round survey and 8/12 (66.7%) completed the second. Inter-observer weighted kappa values for the first and second survey were 0.75 [95% CI 0.56-0.94], indicating substantial agreement, and 0.84 [95% CI 0.70-0.98], indicating nearly perfect agreement, respectively. Intra-observer reliability was 0.86 (range 0.74-0.95) between the first and second surveys, indicating nearly perfect agreement .
CONCLUSION: The modified CDS classification system demonstrated substantial to nearly perfect agreement between and within observers for the evaluation of complications following the surgical treatment of EOS patients. Adoption of this reliable classification system as a standard for reporting complications in EOS patients can be a valuable tool for future research endeavors, as we seek to ultimately improve surgical practices and patient outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.