MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s41999-024-00967-2

Медицинская библиотека · European geriatric medicine · 2024

How to support general practitioners to better detect sarcopenia among older adults: a nested case-control analysis.

Lapi Francesco, Aprile Pierangelo Lora, Cricelli Iacopo, Vetrano Davide Liborio, Cricelli Claudio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study explores correlations of sarcopenia and its proxies, such as history of falls, asthenia, and ambulation issues, with frailty levels among older adults in primary care.

METHODS

In a cohort of 546,590 patients aged 60 years or older, "definite" sarcopenia cases were operationally defined through the use of non-specific diagnostic codes coupled with inspection of free-texts. Proxies of sarcopenia, such as falls history, asthenia, and ambulation issues were considered as well. Frailty was calculated using an Index intended to primary care.

RESULTS

Overall, 171 definite sarcopenia cases were found, rising to 51,520 cases when including proxies (9.4% prevalence). There was a significant association between severe frailty and increased odds of sarcopenia, consistently observed across different event definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia was strongly associated with severe frailty in primary care. The history of falls, asthenia, and ambulation issues were reliable proxies to raise the suspect of sarcopenia. Improved strategies for sarcopenia detection, focusing on specific indicators within severely frail individuals, are warranted.

Для цитирования: Lapi Francesco, Aprile Pierangelo Lora, Cricelli Iacopo, Vetrano Davide Liborio, Cricelli Claudio. How to support general practitioners to better detect sarcopenia among older adults: a nested case-control analysis.. European geriatric medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-00967-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.