Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2010
Field evaluation of clinical features during chikungunya outbreak in Mayotte, 2005-2006.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sissoko Daouda, Ezzedine Khaled, Moendandzé Amrat, Giry Claude, Renault Philippe, Malvy Denis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To record and assess the clinical features of chikungunya fever (CHIKF), with a view to enable diagnosis based on clinical criteria rather than costly laboratory procedures in field conditions.
METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional serologic survey conducted in Mayotte after a massive chikungunya outbreak in 2006, we collected data on clinical features of chikungunya infection and assessed the performance and accuracy of clinical case definition criteria combining different symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 1154 participants included, 440 (38.1%) had chikungunya-specific IgM or IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Of symptomatic participants, 318 (72.3%) had confirmed chikungunya, the dominant symptoms reported were incapacitating polyarthralgia (98.7%), myalgia (93.1%), backache (86%), fever of abrupt onset (85%) and headache (81.4%). There was a strong linear association between symptomatic infection and age (chi(2) for trend = 9.85, P < 0.001). Only 52% of persons with presumptive chikungunya sought medical advice, principally at public primary health care facilities. The association of fever and polyarthralgia had a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI: 79-87) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 86-91). This association allowed to classify correctly 87% (95% CI: 85-89) of individuals with serologically confirmed chikungunya.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the pair fever and incapacitating polyarthralgia is an accurate and reliable tool for identifying presumptive CHIKF cases in the field. These criteria provide a useful evidence base to support operational syndromic surveillance in laboratory-confirmed chikungunya epidemic settings.
METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional serologic survey conducted in Mayotte after a massive chikungunya outbreak in 2006, we collected data on clinical features of chikungunya infection and assessed the performance and accuracy of clinical case definition criteria combining different symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 1154 participants included, 440 (38.1%) had chikungunya-specific IgM or IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Of symptomatic participants, 318 (72.3%) had confirmed chikungunya, the dominant symptoms reported were incapacitating polyarthralgia (98.7%), myalgia (93.1%), backache (86%), fever of abrupt onset (85%) and headache (81.4%). There was a strong linear association between symptomatic infection and age (chi(2) for trend = 9.85, P < 0.001). Only 52% of persons with presumptive chikungunya sought medical advice, principally at public primary health care facilities. The association of fever and polyarthralgia had a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI: 79-87) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 86-91). This association allowed to classify correctly 87% (95% CI: 85-89) of individuals with serologically confirmed chikungunya.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the pair fever and incapacitating polyarthralgia is an accurate and reliable tool for identifying presumptive CHIKF cases in the field. These criteria provide a useful evidence base to support operational syndromic surveillance in laboratory-confirmed chikungunya epidemic settings.