MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000035758

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2023

Publication trends in nutrition research for sarcopenic obesity: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.

Liu Jiye, Li Jiachun

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We used bibliometric methods to evaluate publications on the role of nutrition in sarcopenic obesity and analyzed the current situation and developmental trends over the past 2 decades.

METHODS

Publications from 2002 to 2022 related to the role of nutrition in sarcopenic obesity were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the Bibliometrix R package were applied to build relevant network diagrams.

RESULTS

One thousand ninety-four articles from 64 countries were included. The annual number of publications in this field has shown an intense growth trend. The University of Alberta, Yonsei University, and Korea University are the major research institutions. Clinical Nutrition has published the most papers on the role of nutrition in sarcopenic obesity, and the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is the most co-cited journal. A total of 5834 authors conducted the relevant studies. Yves Boirie has published the most papers in this field, and AJ Cruz-Jentoft is the most co-cited author.

CONCLUSION

This is the first bibliometric study of the role of nutrition in sarcopenic obesity. This study systematically summarizes the research hotspots and development directions in this field, and provides a reference for scholars studying the role of nutrition in sarcopenic obesity.

Для цитирования: Liu Jiye, Li Jiachun. Publication trends in nutrition research for sarcopenic obesity: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.. Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035758.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.