African health sciences · 2025
Alveolar ridge height changes in adults and adolescents with angle class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yin Jun, Li Jing, Li Yue, Hao Yiran, Li Yuanyuan, Wen Yancong, Cai Shixin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study compared the changes in alveolar ridge height in adult and adolescent patients with Angle Class I malocclusion before and after orthodontic treatment.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 110 patients, 55 adults (18 years and above) and 55 adolescents (10 to less than 18 years), were included. The research focused on alveolar bone thickness and changes in ridge height.
RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences in alveolar ridge thickness between the groups at various locations. Adults had thinner alveolar ridges at 7 mm and 9 mm compared to adolescents. Post-treatment, adults experienced increased ridge height in specific regions, while adolescents had minor changes. Some craniofacial angles and chin concavity differed between the groups. Adults exhibited a higher incidence of bone cracking, with an increase post-treatment. Adolescents didn't show significant changes in bone cracking.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, orthodontists should customize treatment for Angle Class I malocclusion based on age-specific findings. Adolescents may experience minor alveolar changes, while adults exhibit increased ridge height and higher fracture risk post-treatment. Monitoring and adapting plans accordingly ensure effective and safe outcomes.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 110 patients, 55 adults (18 years and above) and 55 adolescents (10 to less than 18 years), were included. The research focused on alveolar bone thickness and changes in ridge height.
RESULTS: Results showed no significant differences in alveolar ridge thickness between the groups at various locations. Adults had thinner alveolar ridges at 7 mm and 9 mm compared to adolescents. Post-treatment, adults experienced increased ridge height in specific regions, while adolescents had minor changes. Some craniofacial angles and chin concavity differed between the groups. Adults exhibited a higher incidence of bone cracking, with an increase post-treatment. Adolescents didn't show significant changes in bone cracking.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, orthodontists should customize treatment for Angle Class I malocclusion based on age-specific findings. Adolescents may experience minor alveolar changes, while adults exhibit increased ridge height and higher fracture risk post-treatment. Monitoring and adapting plans accordingly ensure effective and safe outcomes.