PloS one · 2026
Growing up without violence (GWV): Results of a cluster randomised trial of a school-based intervention preventing adolescent sexual abuse and exploitation in Brazil.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiss Ligia, Leal Marto, Portella Ana Paula, Paiva Heloína, Iuliano Agnese, Pires Malini, Shipman Helen, Anderson Elizabeth, Lo Yuki, Kerr Ligia, Kendall Carl, Brito Dario, Barros Marina, Leurent Baptiste
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Child sexual abuse and exploitation (CSAE) are pervasive problems that significantly affect the health of children and adolescents. This paper presents the results of a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) evaluating a school-based intervention designed to prevent CSAE in Brazil through education.
METHODS: We conducted a two-arm cRCT with parallel assignment in two Brazilian municipalities. Sixty schools were randomly allocated to intervention and control arms (30 per group) using stratified randomisation based on municipality and school type (municipal and state-run). We invited 50 randomly selected students, aged 12-17, from each school to complete surveys at baseline and endline. Teachers enrolled in GWV training completed an implementation questionnaire. Our primary analysis focused on a cross-sectional comparison of students' CSAE risk knowledge between control and intervention schools.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in adolescents' CSAE risk knowledge between the study arms (adjusted mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.23, p = 0.87). There was borderline evidence of interaction by gender, with a greater difference in knowledge scores among girls (p = 0.032). No significant association was found between the number of GWV components implemented and knowledge scores.
DISCUSSION: Several factors may contribute to this result: the intervention might not have been implemented with sufficient fidelity or intensity, the true effect of GWV could be minimal and below the study's detection threshold, the intervention may have influenced outcomes that were not measured, or the intervention may simply lack effectiveness. Further rigorous evaluations and implementation studies are essential to ensure that resources are directed toward effective strategies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The American Economic Association's registry for randomised controlled trials (AEA RCT Registry). RCT ID: AEARCTR-0011299, https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/11299.
METHODS: We conducted a two-arm cRCT with parallel assignment in two Brazilian municipalities. Sixty schools were randomly allocated to intervention and control arms (30 per group) using stratified randomisation based on municipality and school type (municipal and state-run). We invited 50 randomly selected students, aged 12-17, from each school to complete surveys at baseline and endline. Teachers enrolled in GWV training completed an implementation questionnaire. Our primary analysis focused on a cross-sectional comparison of students' CSAE risk knowledge between control and intervention schools.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in adolescents' CSAE risk knowledge between the study arms (adjusted mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.23, p = 0.87). There was borderline evidence of interaction by gender, with a greater difference in knowledge scores among girls (p = 0.032). No significant association was found between the number of GWV components implemented and knowledge scores.
DISCUSSION: Several factors may contribute to this result: the intervention might not have been implemented with sufficient fidelity or intensity, the true effect of GWV could be minimal and below the study's detection threshold, the intervention may have influenced outcomes that were not measured, or the intervention may simply lack effectiveness. Further rigorous evaluations and implementation studies are essential to ensure that resources are directed toward effective strategies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The American Economic Association's registry for randomised controlled trials (AEA RCT Registry). RCT ID: AEARCTR-0011299, https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/11299.