MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/ves-230111

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2025

Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ.

Nakdimon Idan, Gordon Barak, Assa Amit, Ben-Ari Oded

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BackgroundFlight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during training sessions. The reported incidence of simulator sickness ranged widely in different studies.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to calculate the incidence of and to define a threshold value for simulator sickness among rotary-wing pilots using the validated Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ).MethodsCH-53 and UH-60 helicopter pilots, who trained in helicopter simulators in the Israeli Air Force, were asked to fulfill SSQ. A score of 20 in the SSQ was defined as the threshold for simulator sickness. Simulator sickness incidence and average SSQ were calculated. Correlations between age and simulator training hours to SSQ scores were analyzed.ResultsA total of 207 rotary-wing aircrew participated in the study. Simulator sickness was experienced by 51.7% of trainees. The average SSQ score was 32.7. A significant negative correlation was found between age and SSQ score.ConclusionsSimulator sickness was experienced by more than half of helicopter pilots. A score of 20 in the SSQ was found to be suitable as the threshold for this condition.

Для цитирования: Nakdimon Idan, Gordon Barak, Assa Amit, Ben-Ari Oded. Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ.. Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation. 2025. DOI: 10.3233/ves-230111.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.