Periodic limb movements in children: prevalence in a referred population.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence of periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS) in children referred for evaluation of sleep disorders.
DESIGN
A retrospective analysis of all overnight polysomnograms (PSG) performed at a tertiary-level pediatric care facility.
SETTING
All PSG studies were performed in the pediatric sleep laboratory associated with the Alberta Children's Hospital in Calgary, AB, Canada. The pediatric sleep laboratory was situated in the Foothills Hospital Alberta Lung Association Sleep Center until August 2002. At that time, the pediatric sleep laboratory was relocated to the Alberta Children's Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS
All children of any age undergoing PSG for any reason between October 1999 and March 2003.
MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS
All PSG records were reviewed, and the following data was extracted: periodic limb movement index (PLM index), periodic limb movements with arousal index (PLM w/arousal index), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and patient demographics (age, sex, comorbidities). A total of 591 PSG studies were reviewed. Thirty-three of the 591 children (5.6%) had evidence of PLMs > 5 per hour. Twenty of the 33 (60.0%) had coexistent obstructive sleep apnea (AHI > 1/hour). Only 7 of the 591 children studied (1.2%) had evidence of PLM > 5 per hour with no other comorbidity. Two of 13 children with PLM > 5 per hour and no evidence of obstructive sleep apnea had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The prevalence of PLMS in the 28 of the 591 subjects with a preexisting diagnosis of ADHD was increased at 7.1%.
CONCLUSIONS
PLMS is an uncommon disorder of childhood. In a select population at increased risk for having a sleep disorder, the prevalence of isolated PLMS is only 1.2%.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.