The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2013
A practical method of measuring oxygen consumption in children with complex mixing circulations by the use of thermodilution cardiac output studies.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schantz Daryl I, Chen Robert P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We describe a method to measure oxygen consumption (VO2) and pulmonary vascular resistive index (PVRI) based on thermodilution cardiac output in patients with complex mixing circulations. We apply this method to patients with a bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis (BDCPA). We compare our measured VO2 with a predicted VO2 based on a formula using height and weight.
METHODS: We reviewed data based on cardiac catheterization and thermodilution cardiac output in a series of 25 catheterizations in patients with BDCPA. We used this data to measure VO2 and PVRI, and looked for a correlation between the predicted and measured VO2. We also assessed whether any other hemodynamic parameter correlated with measured VO2.
RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the predicted and the measured VO2 (correlation coefficient = -0.258, P = .21). We did find a significant correlation in the difference between the measured and predicted VO2 against the measured VO2 such that at a lower measured VO2 the predictive formula tended to overestimate VO2 and at a higher VO2 the formula underestimated VO2 (correlation coefficient = 0.963, P < .0001). Body surface area did not correlate with measured VO2 (correlation coefficient = 0.28, P < .16). Mixed venous oxygen content showed a weak negative correlation with VO2 (correlation coefficient = -0.54, P = .005).
CONCLUSIONS: An assessment of PVRI that is based on a predicted VO2 is unreliable in this patient population. No hemodynamic parameter correlated well with VO2. The use of a measured VO2 is necessary in determining PVRI in these patients.
METHODS: We reviewed data based on cardiac catheterization and thermodilution cardiac output in a series of 25 catheterizations in patients with BDCPA. We used this data to measure VO2 and PVRI, and looked for a correlation between the predicted and measured VO2. We also assessed whether any other hemodynamic parameter correlated with measured VO2.
RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between the predicted and the measured VO2 (correlation coefficient = -0.258, P = .21). We did find a significant correlation in the difference between the measured and predicted VO2 against the measured VO2 such that at a lower measured VO2 the predictive formula tended to overestimate VO2 and at a higher VO2 the formula underestimated VO2 (correlation coefficient = 0.963, P < .0001). Body surface area did not correlate with measured VO2 (correlation coefficient = 0.28, P < .16). Mixed venous oxygen content showed a weak negative correlation with VO2 (correlation coefficient = -0.54, P = .005).
CONCLUSIONS: An assessment of PVRI that is based on a predicted VO2 is unreliable in this patient population. No hemodynamic parameter correlated well with VO2. The use of a measured VO2 is necessary in determining PVRI in these patients.