MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/10711007211041345

Медицинская библиотека · Foot & ankle international · 2021

Anatomical Study of Sinus Tarsi-Based Lateral Lengthening Calcaneal Osteotomy.

Aurich Matthias, Lenz Mark, Hofmann Gunther O, Schubert Wiebke, Knobe Matthias, Roth Klaus Edgar, Simons Paul, Klos Kajetan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lateral lengthening calcaneal osteotomy (LL-CO) is commonly performed as a treatment for an abducted midfoot in pes planovalgus deformity. The purpose of this study is to investigate potential damage to medial structures with a sinus tarsi LL-CO.

METHODS

Sixteen cadaver feet were used. Eight feet had an extended lateral approach, and 8 had a limited lateral (sinus tarsi) approach. All underwent a sinus tarsi LL-CO. Specimens were then dissected to identify inadvertent injury to medial structures.

RESULTS

Sinus tarsi LL-CO was associated with damage to the sustentaculum tali and medial articular facets in 56% and 62.5% of specimens, respectively. No anterior or posterior facet injuries were found, although 56% of specimens had a confluent medial and anterior facet.

CONCLUSION

Damage to the medial articular facet and sustentaculum is possible with a flat cut sinus tarsi LL-CO due to the curved nature of the relevant sinus tarsi and canal anatomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sinus tarsi LL-CO needs to be performed with caution since damage to the subtalar joint is possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Для цитирования: Aurich Matthias, Lenz Mark, Hofmann Gunther O, Schubert Wiebke, Knobe Matthias, Roth Klaus Edgar, Simons Paul, Klos Kajetan. Anatomical Study of Sinus Tarsi-Based Lateral Lengthening Calcaneal Osteotomy.. Foot & ankle international. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/10711007211041345.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.