MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685329

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1996

Tethered cord and associated vertebral anomalies in children and infants with imperforate anus: evaluation with MR imaging and plain radiography.

Long F R, Hunter J V, Mahboubi S, Kalmus A, Templeton J M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate in children and infants with imperforate anus the prevalence and types of occult myelodysplasia that may result in tethered cord and the association of these lesions with vertebral anomalies.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Records and images were retrospectively reviewed in 86 patients who underwent spine magnetic resonance imaging and had either low-level imperforate anus (n = 30), intermediate-level imperforate anus (n = 15), or high-level imperforate anus (n = 41).

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 86 patients (36%) had occult myelodysplasia suggestive of tethered cord (27% of all patients with low-, 33% of all patients with intermediate-, and 44% of all patients with high-level lesions). Of these 31 patients, 16(52%) were asymptomatic, 24, (77%) had a thickened fatty filum, 13 (42%) had normal conus position, and 23 (74%) had vertebral anomalies. Twenty-four of the 31 patients (77%) underwent surgical untethering.

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of patients with all types of imperforate anus have occult myelodysplasia that may necessitate surgical intervention, including those patients with normal spine radiographs.

Для цитирования: Long F R, Hunter J V, Mahboubi S, Kalmus A, Templeton J M. Tethered cord and associated vertebral anomalies in children and infants with imperforate anus: evaluation with MR imaging and plain radiography.. Radiology. 1996. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685329.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.