MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.046

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2014

Comparison of cephalometric patterns in mouth breathing and nose breathing children.

Chung Leng Muñoz Isabel, Beltri Orta Paola

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare cephalometric values between nasal and oral breathing children and to measure the upper and lower airway space in both groups.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 118 pediatric patients, 51 girls and 67 boys, from the Dental Clinic of the Universidad Europea de Madrid. The age ranges of the sample were 6-12 years old. 53 of them were mouth breathers and 65 nose breathers. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained for all of the subjects. The radiographs were analyzed and a cephalometric tracing was performed on each one.

RESULTS

The mouth breathing children showed a more retruded mandible (SNB), and a greater inclination of the mandibular plane (NS-Go Gn) and occlusal plane (NS-O Pl.), than the nose breathing children (P<0.05). The mouth breathing group also had a higher frequency of having the hyoid bone in a more elevated position and the nasopharyngeal air space significantly smaller than the nasal breathing group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Mouth breathing children seem to have an increase in anterior lower facial height, the hyoid bone in a more elevated position and higher tendency towards having a class II malocclusion compared to nose breathing children.

Для цитирования: Chung Leng Muñoz Isabel, Beltri Orta Paola. Comparison of cephalometric patterns in mouth breathing and nose breathing children.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.046.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.