Heart rhythm · 2017
Clinical profile and mutation spectrum of long QT syndrome in Saudi Arabia: The impact of consanguinity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Hassnan Zuhair N, Al-Fayyadh Majid, Al-Ghamdi Bander, Shafquat Azam, Mallawi Yaseen, Al-Hadeq Faten, Tulbah Sahar, Shinwari Zarghuna M A, Almesned Abdulrahman, Alakhfash Ali, Al Fadly Fadel, Hersi Ahmed S, Alhayani Abdullah, Al-Hashem Amal, Arafah Dia, Dzimiri Nduna, Meyer Brian, Rababh Monther, Al-Manea Waleed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited, potentially fatal arrhythmogenic disorder. At least 16 genes have been implicated in LQTS; the yield of genetic analysis of 3 genes (KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A) is about 70%, with KCNQ1 mutations accounting for ∼50% of positive cases. LQTS is mostly inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Systemic analysis of LQTS has not been previously conducted in a population with a high degree of consanguinity.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical and molecular profiles of LQTS in the highly consanguineous Saudi population.
METHODS: Fifty-six Saudi families with LQTS were consecutively recruited and evaluated. Sequencing of KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A genes was conducted on all probands, followed by screening of family relatives.
RESULTS: Genetic analysis was positive in 32 (57.2%) families, with mutations in KCNQ1 identified in 28 families (50%). Surprisingly, 17 (53.1%) probands were segregating homozygous mutations. Family screening identified 123 individuals with mutations; 89 (72.4%) were heterozygous, 23 (18.7%) were homozygous, and 11 (8.9%) were compound heterozygous. Compared to heterozygous, the phenotype was more severe in homozygous individuals, with cardiac symptoms in 78.3% (vs 12.4%), family history of sudden death in 64.7% (vs 44.4%), and prolonged QT interval in 100% (vs 43.8%). Congenital deafness was found in 11 (47.8%) homozygous probands.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides insight into the clinical and molecular profiles of LQTS in a consanguineous population. It underscores the importance of preemptive management in homozygous patients with LQTS and the value of clinical and molecular screening of at-risk relatives.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical and molecular profiles of LQTS in the highly consanguineous Saudi population.
METHODS: Fifty-six Saudi families with LQTS were consecutively recruited and evaluated. Sequencing of KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A genes was conducted on all probands, followed by screening of family relatives.
RESULTS: Genetic analysis was positive in 32 (57.2%) families, with mutations in KCNQ1 identified in 28 families (50%). Surprisingly, 17 (53.1%) probands were segregating homozygous mutations. Family screening identified 123 individuals with mutations; 89 (72.4%) were heterozygous, 23 (18.7%) were homozygous, and 11 (8.9%) were compound heterozygous. Compared to heterozygous, the phenotype was more severe in homozygous individuals, with cardiac symptoms in 78.3% (vs 12.4%), family history of sudden death in 64.7% (vs 44.4%), and prolonged QT interval in 100% (vs 43.8%). Congenital deafness was found in 11 (47.8%) homozygous probands.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides insight into the clinical and molecular profiles of LQTS in a consanguineous population. It underscores the importance of preemptive management in homozygous patients with LQTS and the value of clinical and molecular screening of at-risk relatives.