MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00222194231211948

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of learning disabilities · 2023

Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School.

Baker Scott K, Kennedy Patrick C, Richards Dean, Nelson Nancy J, Fien Hank, Doabler Christian T

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

More than two-thirds of middle school students do not read proficiently. Research has shown that targeted interventions using explicit instruction methods can improve reading outcomes for struggling readers. A central feature of explicit instruction is the systematic implementation of instructional interactions, but it is not clear what specific instructional interaction practices lead to stronger outcomes for middle school readers. This study used a regression discontinuity design to compare the frequency and impact of instructional interactions experienced by U.S. eighth-grade students who received a targeted reading intervention (n = 1,461) with those who did not (n = 4,292). Results indicated that students who received intervention experienced far more instructional interactions with their teachers than did students who did not. However, the association between rates of interaction and student need in the intervention group was minimal, and the relationship between the rate of instructional interactions and reading growth was mixed. Implications for intervening with struggling students in the middle grades are discussed.

Для цитирования: Baker Scott K, Kennedy Patrick C, Richards Dean, Nelson Nancy J, Fien Hank, Doabler Christian T. Measuring Instructional Interactions During Reading Instruction for Students Receiving Intervention in Middle School.. Journal of learning disabilities. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/00222194231211948.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.