Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2021
Role of tranexamic acid in craniosynostosis surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zapata-Copete James A, Gómez-Ospina Juan Camilo, García-Perdomo Herney Andrés, Caycedo Diego J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and harms of using tranexamic acid (TXA) versus placebo/no intervention to reduce blood loss and the need for transfusion in children undergoing surgical correction of craniosynostosis.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, and other sources. We included clinical trials, prospective, retrospective observational studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies. The primary outcomes were blood loss and the need for a transfusion, and secondary outcomes were hemoglobin, hematocrit, and adverse effects. We assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We performed the statistical analysis in R and reported information about the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We evaluated heterogeneity with the I2 test. We produced forest plots to show the amount of evidence available for each outcome and made subgroup analyses.
RESULTS: We included 11 studies in qualitative and quantitative analysis accounting for 752 patients. In general, the risk of all bias was assessed as low for non-randomized studies, and we found high performance and detection bias in one randomized study. TXA significantly reduced blood loss and need for transfusion compared to placebo/no intervention with an MD of -15.47 (95%CI -23.82, -7.11) and -8.18 (95%CI -12.24, -4.11), respectively. These differences were maintained regardless of the type of study, secondary outcomes also favored TXA, and there was no report of adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: TXA reduces blood loss and the need for transfusion when compared to placebo/no intervention. The available studies on this topic suggest its use in these patients and its implementation in surgery protocols.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, and other sources. We included clinical trials, prospective, retrospective observational studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies. The primary outcomes were blood loss and the need for a transfusion, and secondary outcomes were hemoglobin, hematocrit, and adverse effects. We assessed the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We performed the statistical analysis in R and reported information about the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We evaluated heterogeneity with the I2 test. We produced forest plots to show the amount of evidence available for each outcome and made subgroup analyses.
RESULTS: We included 11 studies in qualitative and quantitative analysis accounting for 752 patients. In general, the risk of all bias was assessed as low for non-randomized studies, and we found high performance and detection bias in one randomized study. TXA significantly reduced blood loss and need for transfusion compared to placebo/no intervention with an MD of -15.47 (95%CI -23.82, -7.11) and -8.18 (95%CI -12.24, -4.11), respectively. These differences were maintained regardless of the type of study, secondary outcomes also favored TXA, and there was no report of adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: TXA reduces blood loss and the need for transfusion when compared to placebo/no intervention. The available studies on this topic suggest its use in these patients and its implementation in surgery protocols.