The British journal of ophthalmology · 2013
Refractive outcomes and prediction error following secondary intraocular lens implantation in children: a decade-long analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shenoy Bhamy Hariprasad, Mittal Vaibhev, Gupta Amit, Sachdeva Virender, Kekunnaya Ramesh
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the refractive outcomes, prediction error (PE) and factors affecting PE in children with aphakia following congenital cataract surgery undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
METHODS: We analysed the records of children less than 16 years old who underwent secondary IOL implantation for aphakia following congenital cataract surgery. PE and absolute PE for each case calculated 3 months following secondary IOL implantation were analysed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age at secondary IOL implantation, axial length, keratometry readings and PE.
RESULTS: 174 eyes of 104 children were analysed. Mean age at surgery was 6.08±3.75 years. The mean PE was 1.65±2.46 dioptres (D) (range -3.25 to 7.5 D) and mean absolute PE was 2.15±1.68 D (range 0-7.5 D) at 3 months. There was a statistically significant difference in absolute PE between eyes in which IOL calculation was performed using IOL master (1.80±1.40 D) versus IOL calculation under general anaesthesia with contact method (2.43±1.83 D), p=0.01. Multiple regression analysis revealed an inverse relationship between age at secondary IOL implantation and mean absolute PE (p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: IOL power calculation with SRK II formula with sulcus placement of IOL gives favourable refractive outcomes. Though age-based refraction is targeted, a significant PE may be expected.
METHODS: We analysed the records of children less than 16 years old who underwent secondary IOL implantation for aphakia following congenital cataract surgery. PE and absolute PE for each case calculated 3 months following secondary IOL implantation were analysed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between age at secondary IOL implantation, axial length, keratometry readings and PE.
RESULTS: 174 eyes of 104 children were analysed. Mean age at surgery was 6.08±3.75 years. The mean PE was 1.65±2.46 dioptres (D) (range -3.25 to 7.5 D) and mean absolute PE was 2.15±1.68 D (range 0-7.5 D) at 3 months. There was a statistically significant difference in absolute PE between eyes in which IOL calculation was performed using IOL master (1.80±1.40 D) versus IOL calculation under general anaesthesia with contact method (2.43±1.83 D), p=0.01. Multiple regression analysis revealed an inverse relationship between age at secondary IOL implantation and mean absolute PE (p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: IOL power calculation with SRK II formula with sulcus placement of IOL gives favourable refractive outcomes. Though age-based refraction is targeted, a significant PE may be expected.