MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2017

Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures.

De Boer A Siebe, Meuffels Duncan E, Van der Vlies Cornelis H, Den Hoed P Ted, Tuinebreijer Wim E, Verhofstad Michael H J, Van Lieshout Esther M M, AOFAS Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture.

DESIGN

Multicentre, prospective observational study.

SETTING

This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test-retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5613; Post-results.

Для цитирования: De Boer A Siebe, Meuffels Duncan E, Van der Vlies Cornelis H, Den Hoed P Ted, Tuinebreijer Wim E, Verhofstad Michael H J, Van Lieshout Esther M M, AOFAS Study Group. Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures.. BMJ open. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.