Can the Unipedicular Approach Replace Bipedicular Percutaneous Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Management of Metastatic Vertebral Lesions?

RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical and radiographic results of bipedicular and unipedicular approaches(UPK and BPK) in the management of metastatic vertebral lesions MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with 159 metastatic vertebral lesions who underwent UPK(25 cases, 69 lesions) or BPK(57 cases, 90 lesions) were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical results were assessed mainly depending on the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) and Quality of Life(QoL). Radiographic outcomes were evaluated primarily on the basis of bone cement distribution and changes in vertebral body height(VBH). Major and minor complications were systematically evaluated and compared to assess the safety of the 2 procedures.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in age, sex, types of lesions, location of lesions, posterior vertebral body and/or pedicle involvement, percentage of vertebra invasion between the groups(p=0.17-0.83). The radiographic parameter VBH was similarly improved in both groups(p=0.26-0.93). There was a significant improvement in the clinical parameters VAS score, ODI, and QoL at each follow-up examination compared with the preoperative results(p<0.001). Significant improvement was observed in the VBH at each follow-up point(p<0.05) compared to pre-procedure. UPK was superior to BPK in terms of the operative duration(p<0.001), cement volume(p=0.004), and surgical complications(p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Both UPK and BPK resulted in similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with metastatic vertebral lesions. The UPK had advantages including a shorter operation and lower cement volume than the BPK, which may have played an important role in reducing the incidence of complications. UPK can replace BPK in the treatment of metastatic vertebral lesions.