Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 2008
Framework changes using costal cartilage for microtia reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kizhner Victor, Barak Ami
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Since a known growth-of-cartilage framework is used for reconstruction of microtia under the Brent technique, we set out to address the behavior of the framework under the Nagata technique.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of costal cartilage auricular reconstruction procedures.
PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 1998 and 2005.
INTERVENTIONS: Reconstruction of microtia using the 2-stage Nagata technique.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters checked were patient age at the time of reconstruction, follow-up time, and measurements of the auricular framework height and width both at the time of implantation (represented by the template size) and at final follow-up.
RESULTS: A significant change in auricular height and width was observed. The height decreased by 3.1%, while the width increased by 4.0%. This change was not influenced by follow-up time.
CONCLUSIONS: Auricular reconstruction with the Nagata technique was undertaken when the patients were aged 9 to 10 years, when the auricle had reached nearly its final size. According to our patient sample, it is our opinion that a policy change is unjustifiable.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of costal cartilage auricular reconstruction procedures.
PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 1998 and 2005.
INTERVENTIONS: Reconstruction of microtia using the 2-stage Nagata technique.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters checked were patient age at the time of reconstruction, follow-up time, and measurements of the auricular framework height and width both at the time of implantation (represented by the template size) and at final follow-up.
RESULTS: A significant change in auricular height and width was observed. The height decreased by 3.1%, while the width increased by 4.0%. This change was not influenced by follow-up time.
CONCLUSIONS: Auricular reconstruction with the Nagata technique was undertaken when the patients were aged 9 to 10 years, when the auricle had reached nearly its final size. According to our patient sample, it is our opinion that a policy change is unjustifiable.