DOI 10.1097/00043426-200102000-00008
Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia in patients previously treated for childhood renal tumors: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This review characterized cases of secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) occurring after treatment of renal neoplasms on protocols of the National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) between October 1969 and December 1991.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
The NWTSG database was reviewed for cases of secondary AML and for WT1 status of the affected patients. Referring institutions were contacted by a confidential letter requesting pathology reports, results of immunophenotyping, cytogenetic, and molecular analyses, and details concerning treatment of AML.
RESULTS
Of the 5,278 patients treated during the study period, 43 had second malignant neoplasms, and 7 of these 43 had AML. At the time of diagnosis of Wilms tumor, the median age of the seven patients (4 boys) was 3.2 years. Five of the seven renal neoplasms had favorable histologic characteristics. The most common French-American-British morphology was M5. One patient had bilateral tumors, and two were treated for recurrent Wilms tumor. All patients received chemotherapy regimens that included doxorubicin (6) or etoposide (1), and six were treated with infradiaphragmatic irradiation. The median latency period from initial diagnosis of the renal neoplasm to development of secondary AML was 3 years (range, 1.2-4 yrs). One patient had the translocation t(9:11)(p22;q23); WT1 status was not noted for any of the seven patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The development of secondary AML in this subset of patients after treatment of renal neoplasms may reflect the interaction of the effects of treatment and possible genetic predisposition toward cancer.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.