DOI 10.1007/s00381-022-05800-4
Clinical features and outcome in pediatric arteriovenous malformation: institutional multimodality treatment.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Intracranial arteriovenous-malformation (AVM) is a relatively rare condition in pediatrics, yet is a major cause of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage with a risk of fatal hemorrhage reported to be between 4 and 29%. Little is known about vessel morphology and optimum treatment modalities including multimodality combination therapy and prognosis in children.
METHODS
A retrospective review of all children presenting to our institution from 2006 to 2020 that had an AVM was undertaken.
RESULTS
A total of 50 children were identified with median age of 11 (range 1-16) years. The mean follow-up was 7.6 years. Forty-one children presented as an emergency and of those, 40 had hemorrhage identified on initial brain imaging. The average nidus size was 25 mm, drainage was superficial in 51% of cases, and located in eloquent cortex in 56%. The supplemental Spetzler-Martin grading indicated 78% (39/50) were grade 4 and above (moderate to high risk). Primary treatment modalities included embolization in 50% (25) or SRS in 30% (15) and surgery in 20% (10).The AVM was obliterated on follow-up DSA in 66% children. Three children had post-treatment hemorrhage, two related to embolization and one the day following SRS, giving a re-bleed rate of 6%. The GOSE was available for 32 children at long term follow and 94% had a good outcome (GOSE 5-8). Two children died due to acute hemorrhage (4%).
CONCLUSION
The majority of children with AVM present with hemorrhage. The rebleed rate during definitive treatment is low at 6% over the study period. The selective use of the 3 modalities of treatment has significantly reduced mortality and severe disability.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.