MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e31825dc244

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2012

Classification of trigonocephaly in metopic synostosis.

Beckett Joel S, Chadha Priyanka, Persing John A, Steinbacher Derek M

Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The orbitofrontal deformity in metopic synostosis is recognized clinically but has not been quantitatively defined in a large patient population. The authors' purpose was to document the dysmorphology in metopic synostosis and define subtype gradations.

METHODS

Demographic and computed tomographic information was recorded. Three-dimensional computed tomographic renderings were created digitally. Craniometric analysis was conducted for endocranial bifrontal angle, interzygomaticofrontal suture and interdacryon distance, and angle of orbital aperture to the midline.

RESULTS

Thirty-five computed tomographic scans were analyzed: 25 affected infants (median age, 5 months) and 10 controls (median age, 6 months). The endocranial bifrontal angle ranged from 100 to 148 degrees in metopic patients and 134 to 160 degrees in controls. The metopic group was split into severe metopic (100 to 124 degrees) and moderate metopic (124 to 148 degrees) synostosis. The endocranial bifrontal angle was significantly different among severe metopic, moderate metopic, and control patients. Interzygomaticofrontal suture of the severe group was less than in both moderate (p = 0.0043) and control (p = 0.011) groups. Interdacryon distance was smaller in severe versus moderate (p = 0.0083) and control (p = 0.0002) groups. The orbital rim angle of the severe group was more acute than that in the moderate (p = 0.0106) and control (p = 0.0062) groups. Except for endocranial bifrontal angle, there was no difference between moderate metopic and control groups in any analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Metopic synostosis can be divided into two distinct severity indices. The severe group has significantly narrower orbitofrontal dimensions, whereas the moderate group does not differ from control. Characterization of trigonocephaly may shed light on the etiopathogenesis of disease.

Для цитирования: Beckett Joel S, Chadha Priyanka, Persing John A, Steinbacher Derek M. Classification of trigonocephaly in metopic synostosis.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e31825dc244.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.