MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.002

Медицинская библиотека · Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2016

Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI.

Pourghasem Mohsen, Kamali Nematollah, Farsi Mehrdad, Soltanpour Nabiollah

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between the flat-footedness and obesity.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 1158 school children (653 male and 505 female) participated in this cross sectional descriptive study. According to their age, children were divided into three groups for each gender (6-10, 11-13, 14-18 years old). Diagnosis and severity of flatfoot was assessed in using the Dennis method. BMI of children were calculated as body weight divided by height squared (kg*m-2).

RESULTS

Majority (83.9%) of respondents had normal feet. The prevalence of flatfoot was 16.1% with a decreasing trend with age. Boys had a higher frequency of flatfoot than girls; however the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The prevalence of flatfoot was 17.5% in boys and 14.5% in girls. The percentage of overweight and obese children was 10.3%. A significant difference in the prevalence of flatfoot occurred between; under-weight (13.9%), normal-weight (16.1%), overweight (26.9%), and obese (30.8%); children.

CONCLUSION

The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity is one of the most serious health challenges across the globe, and a positive correlation between increased BMI; and flatfoot is one of the potential complications.

Для цитирования: Pourghasem Mohsen, Kamali Nematollah, Farsi Mehrdad, Soltanpour Nabiollah. Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI.. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.