Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024
Comparison of postoperative analgesia in children following ropivacaine and lidocaine surgical field infiltration with epinephrine for cleft palate repair: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Gaofeng, Jin Shangyi, Chen Jinghui, Xie Haihang, Jin Saifen, Chen Yiyang, Song Xingrong
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ropivacaine in providing postoperative analgesia for children undergoing cleft palate repair.
METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on sixty-four children scheduled for cleft palate repair. The patients received either local infiltration with 1% lidocaine or 0.2% ropivacaine before incision. The primary outcome was the postoperative average pain score, and secondary outcomes included pain scores at various time points, consumption of flurbiprofen and hydromorphone, effectiveness of nurse-controlled analgesia pump, and incidence of bradycardia, vomiting, and respiratory depression.
MAIN RESULTS: The results showed that the postoperative average pain score was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group compared to the lidocaine group (1.27±0.28 vs. 1.75±0.29, P<0.001). Pain scores at multiple postoperative time points were also lower in the ropivac:aine group. Additionally, consumption of flurbiprofen and hydromorphone was lower, and ineffective compressions of the nurse-controlled analgesia pump were reduced in the ropivacaine group. The incidence of vomiting, bradycardia, and respiratory depression did not show significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Local infiltration with ropivacaine effectively provided postoperative analgesia for children undergoing cleft palate repair without major side effects. It was found to be superior to lidocaine in reducing the need for additional rescue analgesia.
METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on sixty-four children scheduled for cleft palate repair. The patients received either local infiltration with 1% lidocaine or 0.2% ropivacaine before incision. The primary outcome was the postoperative average pain score, and secondary outcomes included pain scores at various time points, consumption of flurbiprofen and hydromorphone, effectiveness of nurse-controlled analgesia pump, and incidence of bradycardia, vomiting, and respiratory depression.
MAIN RESULTS: The results showed that the postoperative average pain score was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group compared to the lidocaine group (1.27±0.28 vs. 1.75±0.29, P<0.001). Pain scores at multiple postoperative time points were also lower in the ropivac:aine group. Additionally, consumption of flurbiprofen and hydromorphone was lower, and ineffective compressions of the nurse-controlled analgesia pump were reduced in the ropivacaine group. The incidence of vomiting, bradycardia, and respiratory depression did not show significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Local infiltration with ropivacaine effectively provided postoperative analgesia for children undergoing cleft palate repair without major side effects. It was found to be superior to lidocaine in reducing the need for additional rescue analgesia.