MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastroenterology · 2024

Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Imaoka Hiroshi, Ikeda Masafumi, Kobayashi Satoshi, Ohba Akihiro, Ueno Masayuki, Suzuki Yuko, Tsumura Hidetaka, Kimura Nana, Kawaguchi Shinya, Kawamoto Yasuyuki, Nakachi Kohei, Tsuji Kunihiro, Kobayashi Noritoshi, Ashida Reiko, Okano Naohiro, Umemoto Kumiko, Murohisa Gou, Hosokawa Ayumu, Asagi Akinori, Nebiki Hiroko, Suzuki Rei, Terashima Takeshi, Shibata Ryusuke, Kawata Kazuhito, Doi Toshifumi, Ohyama Hiroshi, Kitano Yohei, Shioji Kazuhiko, Okuyama Hiroyuki, Naganuma Atsushi, Negoro Yuji, Sakamoto Yasunari, Shimizu Satoshi, Morizane Chigusa, Ueno Makoto, Furuse Junji, Nagano Hiroaki, Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.

METHODS

The main objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and those treated with S-1 monotherapy as second-line treatments, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. This study was conducted in 31 institutions participating in Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. To minimize potential biases due to the retrospective design, IPTW analysis was performed with multiple imputation, and imputed IPTW-adjusted hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model and combined into pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 463 metastatic PC patients were enrolled in this study (257 in the S-1 monotherapy group and 206 in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group). The median OS was 7.50 months (95% CI 4.18-12.69 months) in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group and 5.72 months (95% CI 2.76-10.79 months) in the S-1 monotherapy group. In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was associated with a significant OS benefit (pooled IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.779; 95% CI 0.399-0.941; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard second-line treatment for PC patients after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Для цитирования: Imaoka Hiroshi, Ikeda Masafumi, Kobayashi Satoshi, Ohba Akihiro, Ueno Masayuki, Suzuki Yuko, Tsumura Hidetaka, Kimura Nana, Kawaguchi Shinya, Kawamoto Yasuyuki, Nakachi Kohei, Tsuji Kunihiro, Kobayashi Noritoshi, Ashida Reiko, Okano Naohiro, Umemoto Kumiko, Murohisa Gou, Hosokawa Ayumu, Asagi Akinori, Nebiki Hiroko, Suzuki Rei, Terashima Takeshi, Shibata Ryusuke, Kawata Kazuhito, Doi Toshifumi, Ohyama Hiroshi, Kitano Yohei, Shioji Kazuhiko, Okuyama Hiroyuki, Naganuma Atsushi, Negoro Yuji, Sakamoto Yasunari, Shimizu Satoshi, Morizane Chigusa, Ueno Makoto, Furuse Junji, Nagano Hiroaki, Japan Oncology Network in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV vs. S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a real-world study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Journal of gastroenterology. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02186-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.