The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2009
Variations of endoscopic and open repair of metopic craniosynostosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keshavarzi Sassan, Hayden Melanie G, Ben-Haim Sharona, Meltzer Hal S, Cohen Steven R, Levy Michael L
Аннотация
In contrast to sagittal craniosynostosis, the role of endoscopic, minimally invasive approaches in the treatment of metopic craniosynostosis with resulting trigonocephaly is not as well defined. We reviewed the senior authors' (H.M. and S.C.) clinical experience in the treatment of children with metopic craniosynostosis using a variety of endoscopic and open techniques. Thirty-three patients were treated at a single institution during a 5-year period with between 3 and 8 years of follow-up. Sixteen patients underwent 3 variations of endoscopic approaches, and 17 patients had open fronto-orbital advancement. Clinical parameters of the 2 groups were examined including age at surgery, blood loss, operative time, transfusion volume, hospital stay, complications, use of postoperative cranial banding, and the need for reoperation for persistent deformity. The various endoscopic and open techniques used by the authors in the treatment of metopic craniosynostosis are discussed in detail, including rational for individual technique selection and preliminary impressions regarding clinical outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionChild, PreschoolCranial SuturesCraniosynostosesEndoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFrontal BoneHead Protective DevicesHospitalizationHumansInfantLength of StayMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOrbitOrthotic DevicesOsteotomyPatient Care PlanningPostoperative ComplicationsPlastic Surgery ProceduresRecurrenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome