DOI 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate facial asymmetry 3 dimensionally using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and (2) compare the right and left facial hard and soft tissues volumetrically and their interferences on each other.
METHODS
The CBCT data of 49 asymmetric (soft tissue menton deviation, ≥4 mm; distance from the facial midline) (mean age, 19.9 ± 5.6 years) and 39 symmetric patients (soft tissue menton deviation, <4 mm) (mean age, 17.8 ± 5.5 years) were exported to the MIMICS software program (version 13.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Linear, surface distance, angular, volumetric, and surface area measurements were performed 3 dimensionally to assess and compare intragroup and intergroup differences.
RESULTS
In the asymmetry group, linear measurements such as ramus height, mandibular effective and corpus length, and absolute mandibular volumetric measurements were significantly decreased (P <0.001), whereas facial mandibular, and soft and hard tissue volumetric measurements made on 3-dimensional images, and linear measurements on 2-dimensional images were increased (P <0.001) on the deviation side.
CONCLUSIONS
Facial hard and soft tissue asymmetries can be precisely quantified using CBCT. However, especially in the gonial region where the surface topography shows alterations caused by asymmetry, many anatomic landmarks should be chosen for the assessment of asymmetry. At the gonial level, the compensation of the soft tissues for the hard tissues was found on 2-dimensional images; nevertheless, 3-dimensional right and left volumetric soft tissue evaluations provide evidence for asymmetry.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.