Comparison of effectiveness and safety between baricitinib and tocilizumab in severe COVID-19: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulators tocilizumab and baricitinib have been used for the treatment of severe COVID-19, however, there are only few published studies comparing their efficacy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS

All consecutive non-ICU hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients who received baricitinib or tocilizumab, were included retrospectively. Primary outcomes were mortality or intubation on day 14, time to oxygen therapy weaning and duration of hospitalization. Safety was measured as treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

321 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 were included (mean age 62.4 years ± 14.7); 241 (75.1%) received baricitinib (mean age 64.2 years ± 15.2) and 80 (24.9%) tocilizumab (mean age 57.3 ± 11.7). Patients who received baricitinib presented significantly lower risk of mortality or intubation on day 14, compared to the tocilizumab group after adjusting for age, sex, vaccination, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, remdesivir administration and WHO ordinal scale at enrollment (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.86). In the augmented inverse-probability weighting regression, the protective role of baricitinib remained statistically significant (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.88). No difference in secondary bacterial infections was detected, but tocilizumab was associated with significant higher rate of liver injury (Odds Ratio, 95%CI, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests survival and safety are significantly better for baricitinib compared to tocilizumab in severe COVID-19. Clinical randomized trials are needed for confirmation.