Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2009
Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Partecke Lars Ivo, von Bernstorff Wolfram, Karrasch Annette, Cziupka Katharina, Glitsch Anne, Stier Albrecht, Heidecke Claus Dieter, Tepel Jürgen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Evaluation of the feasibility, cost-effectiveness, time of surgery, morbidities, and other/additional findings during laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 148 laparoscopies for suspected acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was safe and cost-effective. No appendiceal stump leaks or wound infections occurred. Of the patients, 4.7% developed intra-abdominal abscesses. Mean time of all procedures was 47 min: 42 min for simple appendectomies (n = 126), 67 min for perforated appendicitis (n = 15), and 75 min for converted procedures (n = 7). Twenty-one of 148 (14.2%) patients had unexpected findings instead of appendicitis: inflamed epiploic appendices (three times), inflammatory disorders of intestine (five times), intestinal adhesions (two times), ovarian cysts (six times: one time with mesenteric lymphadenitis, one time ruptured), tubo-ovarian abscess (one time), tubal necrosis (one time), adnexitis with mesenteric lymphadenitis (one time), and acute cholecystitis (one time). These diagnoses might have been missed during conventional open appendectomy and were, if necessary, treated during laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy should be recommended as standard procedure for acute appendicitis.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 148 laparoscopies for suspected acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was safe and cost-effective. No appendiceal stump leaks or wound infections occurred. Of the patients, 4.7% developed intra-abdominal abscesses. Mean time of all procedures was 47 min: 42 min for simple appendectomies (n = 126), 67 min for perforated appendicitis (n = 15), and 75 min for converted procedures (n = 7). Twenty-one of 148 (14.2%) patients had unexpected findings instead of appendicitis: inflamed epiploic appendices (three times), inflammatory disorders of intestine (five times), intestinal adhesions (two times), ovarian cysts (six times: one time with mesenteric lymphadenitis, one time ruptured), tubo-ovarian abscess (one time), tubal necrosis (one time), adnexitis with mesenteric lymphadenitis (one time), and acute cholecystitis (one time). These diagnoses might have been missed during conventional open appendectomy and were, if necessary, treated during laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy should be recommended as standard procedure for acute appendicitis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyAppendicitisChildComorbidityCost-Benefit AnalysisDiagnosis, DifferentialFallopian TubesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyMaleMesenteric LymphadenitisMiddle AgedNecrosisOvarian CystsPelvic Inflammatory DiseaseTissue AdhesionsYoung Adult