Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2011
Double innominate osteotomy and the Smith-Petersen technique in the treatment of developmental hip disorder.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brdar R, Petronic I, Abramovic D, Nikolic D, Lukac M, Cirovic D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to present results of different surgical orthopaedic approaches in the treatment of children with developmental hip disorder.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the University Childrens Hospital in Belgrade, 21 young adults diagnosed with developmental hip disorder were treated with double osteotomy and with a modified Smith-Peterson approach during a period of 10 years, from 1997 to 2007. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated.
RESULTS: We were successful with 23 hips in 20 patients, since some patients underwent surgery of both hips. The evaluation of improvement was done according to the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel system which indicated very satisfied outcome in five patients, satisfied in 8, fair in 7 and poor in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: In this paper we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of double osteotomy procedures compared with others that are used in the correction of developmental hip disorder. The best solution is adequate and timely diagnosis with proper correction of the deformity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the University Childrens Hospital in Belgrade, 21 young adults diagnosed with developmental hip disorder were treated with double osteotomy and with a modified Smith-Peterson approach during a period of 10 years, from 1997 to 2007. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated.
RESULTS: We were successful with 23 hips in 20 patients, since some patients underwent surgery of both hips. The evaluation of improvement was done according to the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel system which indicated very satisfied outcome in five patients, satisfied in 8, fair in 7 and poor in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: In this paper we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of double osteotomy procedures compared with others that are used in the correction of developmental hip disorder. The best solution is adequate and timely diagnosis with proper correction of the deformity.