Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology · 1998
The effect of brief headward acceleration on human G tolerance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chelette T L, Allnutt R, Albery W B, Tripp L D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To generate, on a multi-axial centrifuge, a negative to positive acceleration profile that reproduces the physiological reaction and subjective symptoms experienced by agile aircraft pilots. Previous research will be summarized and current status of research described.
METHODS: Experiments have been accomplished with the Dynamic Environment Simulator (DES) using different profile generating techniques. The DES was programmed with a set of open-loop profiles that provided five second duration baseline exposures ranging from +1.4 Gz down to -2 Gz followed by rapid transition to positive G levels up 2 to 8 +Gz. Volunteer subjects were instrumented and trained to report visual symptoms.
RESULTS: Both profile generation approaches produce the reduced cardiovascular and subjective tolerance in a subset of subjects tested. Accumulated stress and motion sickness are factors in quantitative measures. Use of the anti-G straining maneuver may only temporarily alleviate the symptoms with a second period of visual symptoms even as the G load is removed. Positive pressure breathing for G (PBG) does not appear to exacerbate the effect, but the advantages gained from PBG may be lost when a sustained G pull is preceded by a negative G push.
CONCLUSIONS: The utility and limitations of using a multi-axial centrifuge for the study of negative to positive G transitions have been described. Greater study is necessary on multiple factors affecting the effect and large numbers of volunteer subjects are needed.
METHODS: Experiments have been accomplished with the Dynamic Environment Simulator (DES) using different profile generating techniques. The DES was programmed with a set of open-loop profiles that provided five second duration baseline exposures ranging from +1.4 Gz down to -2 Gz followed by rapid transition to positive G levels up 2 to 8 +Gz. Volunteer subjects were instrumented and trained to report visual symptoms.
RESULTS: Both profile generation approaches produce the reduced cardiovascular and subjective tolerance in a subset of subjects tested. Accumulated stress and motion sickness are factors in quantitative measures. Use of the anti-G straining maneuver may only temporarily alleviate the symptoms with a second period of visual symptoms even as the G load is removed. Positive pressure breathing for G (PBG) does not appear to exacerbate the effect, but the advantages gained from PBG may be lost when a sustained G pull is preceded by a negative G push.
CONCLUSIONS: The utility and limitations of using a multi-axial centrifuge for the study of negative to positive G transitions have been described. Greater study is necessary on multiple factors affecting the effect and large numbers of volunteer subjects are needed.