Pediatric neurology · 2023
Life on the Frontlines: Caregiver Experience of Pediatric Cerebrospinal Shunt Malfunction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dorner Rebecca A, Boss Renee D, Vazifedan Turaj, Johnson Erin, Garzón Amanda, Lemmon Monica E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize the caregiver experience in the detection and evaluation of pediatric cerebrospinal shunt malfunction.
METHODS: In this descriptive qualitative study, we recruited English-speaking caregivers of children aged five years or less in collaboration with a stakeholder organization. Semistructured interviews were completed; content targeted the caregiver experience of shunt malfunction. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and deidentified. Qualitative data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach.
RESULTS: We enrolled 20 caregivers (n = 20 mothers). The median child age at the time of the interview was 2.8 years; about half (n = 11) were born prematurely and the majority (n = 15) had shunts placed at age less than six months. Caregiver experiences of shunt malfunction were grouped into three major themes: (1) my error could be life or death: the high stakes of shunt malfunction and the ambiguity of malfunction symptoms exacerbated baseline caregiver vigilance; (2) finding and engaging people who can help: hurdles during malfunction evaluation included locating trusted clinicians and advocating for parental intuition; and (3) how the shunt defines our family: caregivers described evolving expertise and modifications made to everyday life due to the threat of malfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, caregivers highlighted the challenges associated with recognizing shunt malfunction, accessing necessary treatment, and the impact of their child's shunt on family life. Future work should leverage these findings to inform counseling about shunt malfunction, develop interventions to better support families in shunt malfunction identification, and educate medical providers.
METHODS: In this descriptive qualitative study, we recruited English-speaking caregivers of children aged five years or less in collaboration with a stakeholder organization. Semistructured interviews were completed; content targeted the caregiver experience of shunt malfunction. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and deidentified. Qualitative data were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach.
RESULTS: We enrolled 20 caregivers (n = 20 mothers). The median child age at the time of the interview was 2.8 years; about half (n = 11) were born prematurely and the majority (n = 15) had shunts placed at age less than six months. Caregiver experiences of shunt malfunction were grouped into three major themes: (1) my error could be life or death: the high stakes of shunt malfunction and the ambiguity of malfunction symptoms exacerbated baseline caregiver vigilance; (2) finding and engaging people who can help: hurdles during malfunction evaluation included locating trusted clinicians and advocating for parental intuition; and (3) how the shunt defines our family: caregivers described evolving expertise and modifications made to everyday life due to the threat of malfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, caregivers highlighted the challenges associated with recognizing shunt malfunction, accessing necessary treatment, and the impact of their child's shunt on family life. Future work should leverage these findings to inform counseling about shunt malfunction, develop interventions to better support families in shunt malfunction identification, and educate medical providers.