Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2008
Efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of children with cerebral palsy: systematic review of literature.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Figueiredo Elyonara Mello, Ferreira Gisela Bastos, Maia Moreira Rodrigo César, Kirkwood Renata Noce, Fetters Linda
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To perform a literature review evaluating the quality of current research on the influence of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
METHODS: A qualitative systematic review of intervention studies including the following words/phrases in the title/abstract: children with CP, AFO, gait and inferential statistical analysis, and outcomes related to gait. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, OTSeeker, Lilacs, and Scielo. Level of evidence was graded using the PEDro Scale.
RESULTS: Two between-group and 18 within-group studies met the inclusion criteria indicating a low level of evidence. Between-group studies each scored 4 on the PEDro Scale, and 17 within-group studies scored 3 and 1 scored 2, indicating low quality. Standard terminology for AFOs was not used and only 6 studies described functional status using appropriate instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies using high quality methods are still needed to support evidence-based decisions regarding the use of AFOs for this population.
METHODS: A qualitative systematic review of intervention studies including the following words/phrases in the title/abstract: children with CP, AFO, gait and inferential statistical analysis, and outcomes related to gait. Databases searched included PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, OTSeeker, Lilacs, and Scielo. Level of evidence was graded using the PEDro Scale.
RESULTS: Two between-group and 18 within-group studies met the inclusion criteria indicating a low level of evidence. Between-group studies each scored 4 on the PEDro Scale, and 17 within-group studies scored 3 and 1 scored 2, indicating low quality. Standard terminology for AFOs was not used and only 6 studies described functional status using appropriate instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies using high quality methods are still needed to support evidence-based decisions regarding the use of AFOs for this population.