Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2020
Estimation of intracranial volume: A comparative study between synthetic MRI and FSL-brain extraction tool (BET)2.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goto Masami, Hagiwara Akifumi, Kato Ayumi, Fujita Shohei, Hori Masaaki, Kamagata Koji, Sugano Hidenori, Arai Hajime, Aoki Shigeki, Abe Osamu, Sakamoto Hajime, Sakano Yasuaki, Kyogoku Shinsuke, Daida Hiroyuki
Аннотация
Brain extraction represents an important step in numerous neuroimaging analyses. The brain extraction tool (BET)2 is a widely used deformable model-based approach for extraction of intracranial volume (ICV). The aim of this study is to estimate the ICV extraction accuracy using synthetic MR(SyMRI) method and BET2 in healthy adult participants and patients with Sturge-Weber Syndrome (SWS), including infants. 'Quantification of relaxation times and proton density by multi-echo acquisition of saturation recovery with turbo-spin-echo readout' (QRAPMASTER) with a 3.0 T magnetic resonance image (MRI) system was used for data acquisition. Statistical evaluations were performed with linear regression analysis and the Jaccard similarity coefficient (J). ICV extraction accuracy with synthetic MR method is found to be higher than BET2, for both aged healthy participants and SWS.