MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.57264/cer-2024-0207

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025

Comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism in Finland, Norway and Sweden.

Ghanima Waleed, Pohjantähti Hanna, Lambrelli Dimitra, Nordstrom Beth, Booth Alison, Graham Sophie, Mokgokong Ruth, Jenkins Aaron, Chaves Jose, Dai Feng, Subash Rupesh, Gottsäter Anders

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Aim: Clinical trial data have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are both noninferior to and safer than conventional therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin using Nordic population-based registries. Materials & methods: This observational cohort study used Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish national administrative data from 2012 to 2018. We identified treatment-naive adult patients with noncancer-related VTE treated with either a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or warfarin. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting for each DOAC-warfarin comparison and assessed the risks of bleeding (overall and by site: gastrointestinal bleeding [GI], intracranial bleeding [ICH], or other bleeding) and recurrent VTE within 6 months after treatment initiation. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the adjusted hazard ratios of each end point. Country estimates were combined using meta-analyses.

Results

After inverse probability of treatment weighting, 22,450 warfarin, 14,542 apixaban and 23,002 rivaroxaban patients were included. At 6 months, for apixaban versus warfarin, the risk of bleeding was lower overall (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.43, 0.61]) and by site (GI: 0.65 [0.45, 0.93]; ICH: 0.58 [0.34, 0.97]; other: 0.45 [0.34, 0.58]). For recurrent VTE the risk was similar for apixaban versus warfarin (0.85 [0.71, 1.02]). For rivaroxaban versus warfarin the risk of bleeding was lower for overall and other bleeding (0.86 [0.75, 0.99]; 0.81 [0.69, 0.95], respectively), but similar for GI and ICH bleeding (1.06 [0.84, 1.34]; 0.68 [0.47, 1.00], respectively). For recurrent VTE the risk was lower for rivaroxaban versus warfarin (0.74 [0.63, 0.87]).

Conclusion

DOACs showed improved safety and at least similar effectiveness compared with warfarin, which is in line with clinical trial estimates.

Для цитирования: Ghanima Waleed, Pohjantähti Hanna, Lambrelli Dimitra, Nordstrom Beth, Booth Alison, Graham Sophie, Mokgokong Ruth, Jenkins Aaron, Chaves Jose, Dai Feng, Subash Rupesh, Gottsäter Anders. Comparative safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism in Finland, Norway and Sweden.. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2025. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0207.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.