DOI 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.09.006
Cerebral Sinovenous Thrombosis in the Asphyxiated Cooled Infants: A Prospective Observational Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis is unusual in the asphyxiated cooled infants, but reliable data regarding the incidence of this comorbidity are lacking. We assessed the incidence of sinovenous thrombosis in a population of asphyxiated cooled infants by performing routine brain magnetic resonance venography.
METHODS
All asphyxiated infants who underwent therapeutic cooling at our institution completed brain magnetic resonance venography after rewarming. Assessing the incidence of cerebral sinovenous thrombosis was the primary goal. Secondary analyses included group comparisons for laboratory tests and monitored parameters, relationship between variables, logistic regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curve for cerebral sinovenous thrombosis prediction.
RESULTS
Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis was detected in 10 of 37 infants (27%), most commonly affecting the superior sagittal sinus (eight of ten). These infants manifested higher blanket (P < 0.001) and lower esophageal temperatures (P = 0.006), lower platelet counts (P = 0.045), and received more red blood cell transfusions (P = 0.038) than the cooled infants without thrombosis. Blanket temperature was independently associated with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (P = 0.049), and 32°C/hour was the optimal cutoff value to predict the event (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 88.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
High incidence or cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia suggests that magnetic resonance venography may be reasonable in many of these children. High blanket temperature may be one variable that helps identify patients at higher risk.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.