MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90005-3

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 1986

Craniofacial growth data for cleft lip patients infancy to 6 years of age: potential applications.

Friede H, Figueroa A A, Naegele M L, Gould H J, Kay C N, Aduss H

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The present work was undertaken to provide craniofacial roentgenocephalometric growth data on a group of patients with cleft lip ranging in age from infancy to 6 years. Included are variables related to the neurocranium and orbit. Mensurational data were derived from cephalograms of 72 patients (44 male and 28 female subjects) with cleft lip only (n = 38) or cleft lip with varying degrees of alveolar cleft (n = 34). The data in this mixed longitudinal sample are reported for ten age groups. On the basis of comparison with reported noncleft roentgenocephalometric values, it is suggested that the data may serve as a reference for early craniofacial growth. Measurements from four persons with different types of craniofacial anomalies are also presented to illustrate the application of the reported data in the assessment of craniofacial growth.

Для цитирования: Friede H, Figueroa A A, Naegele M L, Gould H J, Kay C N, Aduss H. Craniofacial growth data for cleft lip patients infancy to 6 years of age: potential applications.. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90005-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.