DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109500
Incidence of brain lesions in moderate-late preterm infants assessed by cranial ultrasound and MRI: The BIMP-study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of brain lesions in moderate-late preterm (MLPT) infants, born at 32-36 weeks' gestation using cranial ultrasound (cUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS
Prospective cohort study carried out at Isala Women and Children's Hospital between August 2017 and November 2019. cUS was performed at postnatal day 3-4 (early-cUS), before discharge and repeated at term equivalent age (TEA) in MLPT infants born between 32+0 and 35+6 weeks' gestation. At TEA, MRI was also performed. Several brain lesions were assessed e.g. hemorrhages, white matter and deep gray matter injury. Brain maturation was visually evaluated. Lesions were classified as mild or moderate-severe. Incidences and confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS
166 MLPT infants were included of whom 127 underwent MRI. One or more mild lesions were present in 119/166 (71.7 %) and moderate-severe lesions in 6/166 (3.6 %) infants on cUS and/or MRI. The most frequent lesions were signs suggestive of white matter injury: inhomogeneous echogenicity in 50/164 infants (30.5 %) at early-cUS, in 12/148 infants (8.1 %) at TEA-cUS and diffuse white matter signal changes (MRI) in 27/127 (23.5 %) infants. Cerebellar hemorrhage (MRI) was observed in 16/127 infants (12.6 %). Delayed maturation (MRI) was seen in 17/117 (13.4 %) infants. Small hemorrhages and punctate white matter lesions were more frequently detected on MRI than on cUS.
CONCLUSIONS
In MLPT infants mild brain lesions were frequently encountered, especially signs suggestive of white matter injury and small hemorrhages. Moderate-severe lesions were less frequently seen.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.