The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2001
The effect of neurocranial surgery on basicranial morphology in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DeLeon V B, Zumpano M P, Richtsmeier J T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Isolated sagittal craniosynostosis produces a scaphocephalic neurocranium associated with abnormal basicranial morphology, providing additional evidence of the developmental relationship of the neurocranium and basicranium. Corrective surgical procedures vary, but the immediate impact of the surgical procedure is restricted to the neurocranium. This study addresses the secondary effects of neurocranial surgery on the cranial base.
DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for preoperative (n = 25) and postoperative (n = 12) patients with isolated sagittal synostosis. Landmark data from 14 landmarks on and around the cranial base were collected from 3-D CT reconstructions and analyzed using Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Subsamples of age-matched patients were used to identify basicranial differences in pre- and postoperative patients and to compare postoperative growth patterns identified in longitudinal data with preoperative growth patterns characterized in cross-sectional data.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < or = 0.10) were found in the morphology of the cranial base in preoperative and postoperative patients. The relative positions of the landmarks nasion, right asterion, and left asterion are similar in preoperative and postoperative patients. However, the position of these landmarks relative to the cranial base is different in the two groups, being positioned relatively more anteriorly in postoperative patients. In addition, we found that the cranial base angle, on average, neither increases nor decreases in the first postoperative year. These morphological differences are associated with divergent growth trajectories in the operated and unoperated cranial base.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of specific procedure, neurocranial surgery in sagittal synostosis patients affects growth patterns of the cranial base. The lack of change in the postoperative cranial base angle suggests that neurocranial surgery alleviates the occipital rotation and decreased cranial base angle described in the sagittal synostosis basicranium.
DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for preoperative (n = 25) and postoperative (n = 12) patients with isolated sagittal synostosis. Landmark data from 14 landmarks on and around the cranial base were collected from 3-D CT reconstructions and analyzed using Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Subsamples of age-matched patients were used to identify basicranial differences in pre- and postoperative patients and to compare postoperative growth patterns identified in longitudinal data with preoperative growth patterns characterized in cross-sectional data.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p < or = 0.10) were found in the morphology of the cranial base in preoperative and postoperative patients. The relative positions of the landmarks nasion, right asterion, and left asterion are similar in preoperative and postoperative patients. However, the position of these landmarks relative to the cranial base is different in the two groups, being positioned relatively more anteriorly in postoperative patients. In addition, we found that the cranial base angle, on average, neither increases nor decreases in the first postoperative year. These morphological differences are associated with divergent growth trajectories in the operated and unoperated cranial base.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of specific procedure, neurocranial surgery in sagittal synostosis patients affects growth patterns of the cranial base. The lack of change in the postoperative cranial base angle suggests that neurocranial surgery alleviates the occipital rotation and decreased cranial base angle described in the sagittal synostosis basicranium.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Case-Control StudiesCephalometryChild, PreschoolConfidence IntervalsCraniosynostosesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFrontal BoneHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantMaleNasal BoneOccipital BoneParietal BonePetrous BoneSkull BaseSphenoid BoneStatistics as TopicTemporal BoneTomography, X-Ray Computed