MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e31819b96a5

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2009

Three-dimensional analysis in facial asymmetry: comparison with model analysis and conventional two-dimensional analysis.

Moro Alessandro, Correra Pasquale, Boniello Roberto, Gasparini Giulio, Pelo Sandro

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to compare a computed tomographic (CT) three-dimensional analysis with a model analysis to use it as diagnostic aid for the evaluation of occlusal plane tilting in facial asymmetry. Ten patients with facial asymmetry underwent CT three-dimensional examination, plaster cast analysis, and two-dimensional cephalometric analysis. The distance between a reference plane to the upper first molar and upper canine was measured on three-dimensional CT, on models, and on cephalograms to assess occlusal plane tilting. Measurements taken on three-dimensional CT were compared with those taken on articulator and cephalograms, and the level of discordance between the different analyses was evaluated. Quantitative data on the occlusal tilting are similar, but three-dimensional CT gives a better representation of anatomy, thus reducing interpretative problems about altered individual anatomy. Three-dimensional CT seems to be so helpful in detecting individual anatomical variations that it can be adopted in the diagnosis for severe craniofacial asymmetry.

Для цитирования: Moro Alessandro, Correra Pasquale, Boniello Roberto, Gasparini Giulio, Pelo Sandro. Three-dimensional analysis in facial asymmetry: comparison with model analysis and conventional two-dimensional analysis.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31819b96a5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.