Pharmaceutical research · 1996
In vivo and in vitro percutaneous absorption of cancer preventive flavonoid apigenin in different vehicles in mouse skin.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li B, Birt D F
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In vivo and in vitro percutaneous absorption of apigenin was investigated in three vehicles previously used in cancer prevention studies to determine the drug delivery properties for optimal chemo-preventive activity.
METHODS: In vivo percutaneous absorption of apigenin on SENCAR mice was studied with DMSO and acetone/DMSO (A/D, 4:1) vehicle. In vitro percutaneous absorption studies used whole mouse skin, without subcutaneous fat, mounted on Franz diffusion cells with 37 degrees C Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline as the receptor fluid. The skin was treated with [G-3H]-apigenin in DMSO, A/D (4:1), or propylene glycol/DMSO (PG/D, 4:1).
RESULTS: Apigenin uptake by epidermal cells and distribution in epidermis following in vivo topical treatment in two vehicles was in the order of A/D > DMSO, while apigenin distribution in dermis and subcutaneous fat was not different between DMSO and A/D. Total apigenin absorption in mouse skin in vitro was in the order of A/D > DMSO > PG/D. However, apigenin sub-tissue distribution within epidermis determined by tape-stripping and by determination of apigenin in dermal and epidermal tissue indicated that DMSO delivered more apigenin into viable epidermis than A/D while A/D deposited more apigenin in the stratum corneum. Apigenin absorption in mouse skin with DMSO or A/D showed saturation kinetics while apigenin in PG/D showed very low absorption initially and non-saturated absorption in a period of 6 hr. HPLC-scintillation profiles of in vitro samples showed no evidence of apigenin metabolism in mouse skin.
CONCLUSIONS: Delivering apigenin into viable epidermis appears to be a necessary property for an apigenin formulation to be effective in skin cancer prevention.
METHODS: In vivo percutaneous absorption of apigenin on SENCAR mice was studied with DMSO and acetone/DMSO (A/D, 4:1) vehicle. In vitro percutaneous absorption studies used whole mouse skin, without subcutaneous fat, mounted on Franz diffusion cells with 37 degrees C Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline as the receptor fluid. The skin was treated with [G-3H]-apigenin in DMSO, A/D (4:1), or propylene glycol/DMSO (PG/D, 4:1).
RESULTS: Apigenin uptake by epidermal cells and distribution in epidermis following in vivo topical treatment in two vehicles was in the order of A/D > DMSO, while apigenin distribution in dermis and subcutaneous fat was not different between DMSO and A/D. Total apigenin absorption in mouse skin in vitro was in the order of A/D > DMSO > PG/D. However, apigenin sub-tissue distribution within epidermis determined by tape-stripping and by determination of apigenin in dermal and epidermal tissue indicated that DMSO delivered more apigenin into viable epidermis than A/D while A/D deposited more apigenin in the stratum corneum. Apigenin absorption in mouse skin with DMSO or A/D showed saturation kinetics while apigenin in PG/D showed very low absorption initially and non-saturated absorption in a period of 6 hr. HPLC-scintillation profiles of in vitro samples showed no evidence of apigenin metabolism in mouse skin.
CONCLUSIONS: Delivering apigenin into viable epidermis appears to be a necessary property for an apigenin formulation to be effective in skin cancer prevention.