Gaceta sanitaria · 2008
[An epidemic outbreak with respiratory symptoms in the province of Almeria [Spain] due to toxic microalgae exposure].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barroso García Pilar, Rueda de la Puerta Pilar, Parrón Carreño Tesifón, Marín Martínez Porfirio, Guillén Enríquez Javier
Аннотация
AIM: To describe an outbreak with symptoms of respiratory tract irritation reported in a village located on the Almerian coast in August 2006, as well as the etiological research performed.
METHODS: We performed a descriptive case-control study. The village was divided into three areas (from 1 to 3) according to the distance from the sea. Symptomatology was subjectively assessed on an ascending severity scale (from 1 to 3). Attack rates (AR) were estimated. To correlate symptom severity by areas and type of exposure, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. Environmental research was performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven cases and 26 controls were surveyed. An AR of 69% was estimated. The most frequent symptom was sneezing (87.7%). Residents in area 1 had a higher risk of more severe symptoms than those in area 3 (OR = 46.7; 95%CI: 4.7-2,067.4). Residents who reported having spent more time outside had a higher risk of more severe symptoms (OR = 12.2; 95%CI: 1.1-615.1). A concentration of dinoflagellates Ostreopsis of 1200 cells/l was determined in sea water.
CONCLUSIONS: An outbreak with respiratory symptoms and with differing severity depending on the distance of housing from the sea occurred. According to the environmental and epidemiological research, the symptoms were probably related to the presence of Ostreopsis toxic microalgae.
METHODS: We performed a descriptive case-control study. The village was divided into three areas (from 1 to 3) according to the distance from the sea. Symptomatology was subjectively assessed on an ascending severity scale (from 1 to 3). Attack rates (AR) were estimated. To correlate symptom severity by areas and type of exposure, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. Environmental research was performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven cases and 26 controls were surveyed. An AR of 69% was estimated. The most frequent symptom was sneezing (87.7%). Residents in area 1 had a higher risk of more severe symptoms than those in area 3 (OR = 46.7; 95%CI: 4.7-2,067.4). Residents who reported having spent more time outside had a higher risk of more severe symptoms (OR = 12.2; 95%CI: 1.1-615.1). A concentration of dinoflagellates Ostreopsis of 1200 cells/l was determined in sea water.
CONCLUSIONS: An outbreak with respiratory symptoms and with differing severity depending on the distance of housing from the sea occurred. According to the environmental and epidemiological research, the symptoms were probably related to the presence of Ostreopsis toxic microalgae.