The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2009
Adenotonsillectomy for sleep-disordered breathing in children with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amonoo-Kuofi Kwamena, Phillips Seamus P, Randhawa Premjit S, Lane Roderick, Wyatt Michelle E, Leighton Susanna E J
Аннотация
Syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) is known to be associated with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in childhood. Problems can occur at various levels, but midface hypoplasia is a major factor in affected infants.Adenotonsillectomy (AT) has been proven to be efficacious as a first-line treatment of SDB in healthy children. However, its role in the treatment of this issue in those with SCS has not been evaluated. Owing to the multiple possible levels of obstruction in such individuals, AT may have no benefit. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AT in this group of patients.Twenty-six children with SCS with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were treated with AT. The mean age at surgery was 4.5 years (range, 1.6-13.9 y). Seven had severe OSA, 11 had moderate OSA, and 7 had mild OSA preoperatively. Of 25 children, 15 (60%) demonstrated an improvement in sleep severity scores postoperatively.Overall, there was a significant improvement in the mean number of saturation dips greater than 4%/h and in the mean nadir of dips in saturation after the operation. There was no significant difference in mean oxygen saturation, number of pulse rate rises per hour, or percentage time spent less than 90% SaO2.Clinically, there is thought to be some benefit in performing AT in these groups of patients. In children with SCS, in whom the cause of obstruction might be at multiple levels, AT should still to be considered as first-line treatment in the management of OSA/SDB.We acknowledge that some children may still go on to require further airway intervention. Further multicenter trials would be useful to examine more closely the significance of the effects of AT in children with craniofacial disorders experiencing SDB.