Pediatric blood & cancer · 2025
Reflections on Sperm Banking Decisions and Support Needs Among Adolescent Males and Their Caregivers 1 Year After Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karkare Tanvi, Roche Charleen I, Griffith Megan M, Quinn Gwendolyn P, O'Brien Sarah H, Stanek Charis J, Klosky James L, Colton Zachary, Audino Anthony, Yeager Nicholas, Whiteside Stacy, English Jennifer, Gerhardt Cynthia A, Nahata Leena
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Approximately half of male cancer survivors experience infertility following cancer treatment, which can lead to psychosocial distress. The aim of this study was to identify support needs and reflections on the decision-making process related to sperm banking among adolescent male cancer survivors and their caregivers at 1 year post-diagnosis.
METHODS: As part of a randomized controlled trial testing a family-centered sperm banking decision-making intervention, males diagnosed with cancer (12-25 years old) and their caregivers completed semi-structured interviews 1 year post-diagnosis. Thematic analysis was conducted by three independent coders (κ = 0.80) and focused on two interview questions: (1) Is there anything you wish you would have known or done before making the [sperm banking] decision? and (2) What information or support do you think is needed regarding your/your son's future fertility goals?
RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with adolescents (n = 20) and caregivers (n = 18) revealed three primary themes: (1) satisfaction with information received at diagnosis, but retrospective desire for more decision-making time; (2) current desire for additional fertility-related support; (3) potential need for future fertility-related support.
CONCLUSION: Despite satisfaction with the oncofertility consultation at diagnosis, clinical teams should prioritize fertility education moving forward and allow additional time for sperm banking decision-making (when possible) at diagnosis. Counseling gaps can lead to uncertainty, unplanned pregnancies, and adverse mental health outcomes. Thus, it is important to revisit issues surrounding fertility and family planning after treatment, particularly among adolescents transitioning to adulthood.
METHODS: As part of a randomized controlled trial testing a family-centered sperm banking decision-making intervention, males diagnosed with cancer (12-25 years old) and their caregivers completed semi-structured interviews 1 year post-diagnosis. Thematic analysis was conducted by three independent coders (κ = 0.80) and focused on two interview questions: (1) Is there anything you wish you would have known or done before making the [sperm banking] decision? and (2) What information or support do you think is needed regarding your/your son's future fertility goals?
RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with adolescents (n = 20) and caregivers (n = 18) revealed three primary themes: (1) satisfaction with information received at diagnosis, but retrospective desire for more decision-making time; (2) current desire for additional fertility-related support; (3) potential need for future fertility-related support.
CONCLUSION: Despite satisfaction with the oncofertility consultation at diagnosis, clinical teams should prioritize fertility education moving forward and allow additional time for sperm banking decision-making (when possible) at diagnosis. Counseling gaps can lead to uncertainty, unplanned pregnancies, and adverse mental health outcomes. Thus, it is important to revisit issues surrounding fertility and family planning after treatment, particularly among adolescents transitioning to adulthood.