Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2015
Strabismus in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1-associated optic pathway glioma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parness-Yossifon Reut, Listernick Robert, Charrow Joel, Barto Heath, Zeid Janice Lasky
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To characterize the incidence, type, natural history, and treatment outcomes of strabismus in pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and optic pathway glioma (OPG).
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with NF1 and OPG at our neurofibromatosis clinic since 1985 were reviewed retrospectively. We noted age at diagnosis, reason for referral to our clinic, ophthalmologic examination results, presence or absence of strabismus, strabismus type and treatment, and final results of treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. Of these, 22 (28.9%) had strabismus: 5 (22.7%) had esotropia and 17 (77.2%) had exotropia; of those with exotropia, 10 (45%) also had hypotropia. In 12 patients (54.5%), strabismus was present at the first ophthalmologic examination. The development of strabismus preceded the diagnosis of both NF1 and OPG in 4 (5.3%) patients and the diagnosis of OPG in another 2 (2.6%) patients with known NF1. In 16 (76%) patients, the strabismus was sensory. Five patients (22.7%) underwent surgery, which resulted in a deviation angle of <10(Δ) in 1 patient, <20(Δ) in 2 patients, and >20(Δ) in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Strabismus was the presenting symptom and led to the diagnosis of OPG in a subset of patients, including those who did not have a previous diagnosis of NF1. Exotropia, especially associated with a hypotropia, was the most common strabismic deviation seen in these patients. Sensory strabismus was the most common type seen in this population. Deviations of <10(Δ) may be difficult to achieve with strabismus surgery.
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with NF1 and OPG at our neurofibromatosis clinic since 1985 were reviewed retrospectively. We noted age at diagnosis, reason for referral to our clinic, ophthalmologic examination results, presence or absence of strabismus, strabismus type and treatment, and final results of treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. Of these, 22 (28.9%) had strabismus: 5 (22.7%) had esotropia and 17 (77.2%) had exotropia; of those with exotropia, 10 (45%) also had hypotropia. In 12 patients (54.5%), strabismus was present at the first ophthalmologic examination. The development of strabismus preceded the diagnosis of both NF1 and OPG in 4 (5.3%) patients and the diagnosis of OPG in another 2 (2.6%) patients with known NF1. In 16 (76%) patients, the strabismus was sensory. Five patients (22.7%) underwent surgery, which resulted in a deviation angle of <10(Δ) in 1 patient, <20(Δ) in 2 patients, and >20(Δ) in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Strabismus was the presenting symptom and led to the diagnosis of OPG in a subset of patients, including those who did not have a previous diagnosis of NF1. Exotropia, especially associated with a hypotropia, was the most common strabismic deviation seen in these patients. Sensory strabismus was the most common type seen in this population. Deviations of <10(Δ) may be difficult to achieve with strabismus surgery.