MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2214676

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2023

Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Fizazi Karim, Piulats Josep M, Reaume M Neil, Ostler Peter, McDermott Ray, Gingerich Joel R, Pintus Elias, Sridhar Srikala S, Bambury Richard M, Emmenegger Urban, Lindberg Henriette, Morris David, Nolè Franco, Staffurth John, Redfern Charles, Sáez María I, Abida Wassim, Daugaard Gedske, Heidenreich Axel, Krieger Laurence, Sautois Brieuc, Loehr Andrea, Despain Darrin, Heyes Catherine A, Watkins Simon P, Chowdhury Simon, Ryan Charles J, Bryce Alan H, TRITON3 Investigators

Рандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In a phase 2 study, rucaparib, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), showed a high level of activity in patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review.

RESULTS

Of the 4855 patients who had undergone prescreening or screening, 270 were assigned to receive rucaparib and 135 to receive a control medication (intention-to-treat population); in the two groups, 201 patients and 101 patients, respectively, had a BRCA alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer with rucaparib than with a control medication among patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA alteration. (Funded by Clovis Oncology; TRITON3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02975934.).

Для цитирования: Fizazi Karim, Piulats Josep M, Reaume M Neil, Ostler Peter, McDermott Ray, Gingerich Joel R, Pintus Elias, Sridhar Srikala S, Bambury Richard M, Emmenegger Urban, Lindberg Henriette, Morris David, Nolè Franco, Staffurth John, Redfern Charles, Sáez María I, Abida Wassim, Daugaard Gedske, Heidenreich Axel, Krieger Laurence, Sautois Brieuc, Loehr Andrea, Despain Darrin, Heyes Catherine A, Watkins Simon P, Chowdhury Simon, Ryan Charles J, Bryce Alan H, TRITON3 Investigators. Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.. The New England journal of medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2214676.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.