MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000355127

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric neurosurgery · 2013

Ring apophysis fracture in pediatric lumbar disc herniation: a common entity.

Singhal Ash, Mitra Anish, Cochrane Doug, Steinbok Paul

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) can be associated with ring apophysis fracture (RAF), which is found in 6% of adult cases. However, the incidence and management of RAF in pediatric LDH is not well documented. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of RAF in pediatric LDH, identify risk factors and explore the influence of RAF on the surgical management and outcome of LDH patients.

METHODS

Hospital records and images were retrospectively reviewed for all pediatric patients (<18 years old) who underwent CT scanning for LDH at BC Children's Hospital from 1985 to 2010.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients met the study inclusion criteria. RAF was present in 38% of the pediatric patients with LDH. There was a significant correlation with gender (p = 0.021; 55% of the males had RAF, and 20% of the females) and association with central herniations (p = 0.003). At the last follow-up, 58% of the patients with RAF were symptom free, compared with 68% of the patients with no RAF.

CONCLUSION

RAF is more frequently associated with LDH in children than in adults. Gender and central disc herniation are associated with RAF. Given the frequency of RAF, to properly identify these fractures and anticipate their treatment, preoperative CT would be necessary.

Для цитирования: Singhal Ash, Mitra Anish, Cochrane Doug, Steinbok Paul. Ring apophysis fracture in pediatric lumbar disc herniation: a common entity.. Pediatric neurosurgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000355127.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.