Journal of primary care & community health · 2021
Characteristics of Rotavirus, ETEC, and Vibrio Cholerae Among Under 2-year Children Attending an Urban Diarrheal Disease Hospital in Bangladesh.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sarker Mohammad Habibur Rahman, Moriyama Michiko, Rahman Md Moshiur, Das Sumon Kumar, Uzzaman Md Nazim, Das Jui, Uddin Aftab, Banu Shakila, Khan Soroar Hossain, Shahid Abu Smsb, Shahunja K M, Chisti Mohammod Jobayer, Faruque Abu S G, Ahmed Tahmeed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Information on comparative clinical and host characteristics of under-2 children with watery diarrhea caused by rotavirus, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), and Vibrio cholerae as single pathogens is lacking. We sought to investigate the sociodemographic, clinical, and host characteristics of under-2 children hospitalized due to these pathogens.
METHODOLOGY: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study using the icddr,b Diarrheal Diseases Surveillance System. Children of either sex, <2 years with diarrhea, who attended the hospital during 2014 to 2018, constituted the study population. Stool specimens having a single pathogen like rotavirus, ETEC, or Vibrio cholerae constituted the cases and stool specimens having no detectable common enteropathogens comprised the controls. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was done where control was the reference group.
RESULTS: A total of 14 889 patients were enrolled, 6939 of whom were under-2 children, and 5245 (76%) constituted our study population. Among them 48% (n = 2532), 3% (n = 148) and 1% (n = 49) had rotavirus, ETEC, and Vibrio cholera, respectively. A control group (diarrhea without these 3 or Shigella, Salmonella, Aeromonas) accounted for 48% (n = 2516). In multinomial regression model, children with rotavirus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-1.55) less often presented with dehydrating diarrhea compared to those with ETEC (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.26) and cholera (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.11-4.57). Rotavirus diarrhea was associated (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.46) with those who received antimicrobials prior to hospital admission and protectively associated with drinking tap water (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95); however, ETEC diarrhea had protective association (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.92) with children who received antimicrobials prior to hospital admission and was associated with drinking tap water (aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19-2.66). Use of intravenous fluid was associated with cholera (aOR, 10.36; 95% CI, 4.85-22.16) and had protective association with rotavirus episodes (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentations and host characteristics of rotavirus, ETEC, and Vibrio cholerae diarrhea differed from each other and the information may be helpful for clinicians for better understanding and proper management of these children.
METHODOLOGY: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study using the icddr,b Diarrheal Diseases Surveillance System. Children of either sex, <2 years with diarrhea, who attended the hospital during 2014 to 2018, constituted the study population. Stool specimens having a single pathogen like rotavirus, ETEC, or Vibrio cholerae constituted the cases and stool specimens having no detectable common enteropathogens comprised the controls. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was done where control was the reference group.
RESULTS: A total of 14 889 patients were enrolled, 6939 of whom were under-2 children, and 5245 (76%) constituted our study population. Among them 48% (n = 2532), 3% (n = 148) and 1% (n = 49) had rotavirus, ETEC, and Vibrio cholera, respectively. A control group (diarrhea without these 3 or Shigella, Salmonella, Aeromonas) accounted for 48% (n = 2516). In multinomial regression model, children with rotavirus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-1.55) less often presented with dehydrating diarrhea compared to those with ETEC (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.26) and cholera (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.11-4.57). Rotavirus diarrhea was associated (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.46) with those who received antimicrobials prior to hospital admission and protectively associated with drinking tap water (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95); however, ETEC diarrhea had protective association (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.92) with children who received antimicrobials prior to hospital admission and was associated with drinking tap water (aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19-2.66). Use of intravenous fluid was associated with cholera (aOR, 10.36; 95% CI, 4.85-22.16) and had protective association with rotavirus episodes (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentations and host characteristics of rotavirus, ETEC, and Vibrio cholerae diarrhea differed from each other and the information may be helpful for clinicians for better understanding and proper management of these children.